Skip to main content

Russia 'on wrong side of history' over Syria chemical weapons – US

A top US disarmament official has accused Russia of being on the wrong side of history on chemical weapon use in Syria, after reports of a chlorine attack in the besieged enclave of eastern Ghouta and the leaking of a UN reportinto the supply of related items from North Korea.

The world’s chemical weapons watchdog is said to have opened an investigation into the latest reports of chemical attacks in Ghouta, where doctors said more than a dozen civilians had been treated for symptoms that matched those of exposure to chlorine gas.The investigation also comes a day after details of a UN report were leaked, which said North Korea had sent Syria more than 40 items used in ballistic and chemical weapons programmes in the five years from 2012 to 2017.

Bashar al-Assad’s government was supposed to have given up its chemical weapons arsenal under a deal brokered in 2013 between the US and Russia, but the agreement does not include chlorine because of its industrial uses.

A senior US disarmament official said on Wednesday that Russia had violated its commitments as guarantor of the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile and preventing the Assad government from using them.

Robert Wood, the US permanent representative to the Conference on Disarmament, told reporters in Geneva: “Russia is on the wrong side of history with regard to chemical weapons use in Syria.”


Source :- theguardian

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Legal Protection for Foreign Direct Investments

  homepage    For solid and consistent in progression of Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) to Nigeria, the nation has throughout the long term set up cordial lawful system for Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) insurance.  In this Foreign Investors' Guidelines for Doing Business in Nigeria Series, we will inspect the lawful systems set up to support an expanding FDIs inflow and guaranteeing unfamiliar financial backers' trust in the country.  here We will examine unfamiliar financial backers' securities going from assurance of arbitral procedures and other debate goal systems in the country.  The reality with present day financial frameworks is that no nation can be an island monetarily; Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) security is extremely vital for the effective achievement of unfamiliar financial backers' business objective(s) and monetary advancement of any economy.   redstateinvesting There are steps that have nations can legitimately take in ...

The Recap: sign up for the best of the Guardian's sport coverage

Let our team of editors be your guide to the best of the Guardian’s award-winning sport coverage from the past week. We’ll email you the stand-out features and interviews, insightful analysis and highlights from the archive, plus films, podcasts, galleries and more – all arriving in your inbox at 12pm every Friday. And we’ll tee you up for the weekend and let you know our live coverage plans so you won’t miss a thing. Source :- theguardian

FIA’s Jean Todt defends Halo F1 system from ‘childish’ Toto Wolff criticism

The president of the FIA, Jean Todt, has issued a robust defence of his organisation’s decision to impose the Halo cockpit protection system on Formula One this season. Todt dismissed criticism from the Mercedes executive director, Toto Wolff, as “childish” and stressed that the FIA would not shy away from making difficult decisions in the interests of safety. The Halo device will make its race debut at the opening round in Melbourne but has attracted criticism on aesthetic grounds and because it is in contradiction of the spirit of an open-cockpit series. Mercedes confidence is an ominous sign after Barcelona F1 testing | Giles Richards Read more Wolff has said he would remove it with a chainsaw if given the opportunity but Todt rejected his stance. “I will not react to whatever has been said. It is simply a childish game,” he said. “It’s very inappropriate, whoever you are, to publicly deny something which is introduced. For me, constructive criticism is always good because it makes ...